LEGAL CONSEQUENCES FOR OPENAI AND THE SIMILARITY TO SCARLETT JOHANSSON

OpenAI could potentially face legal consequences for creating a ChatGPT voice that closely resembles Scarlett Johansson, whether intentional or not. The company’s CEO even acknowledged the similarities, which could further complicate the situation, according to intellectual property lawyers.

POTENTIAL ACTIONS AND PRECEDENTS

Legal experts suggest that Scarlett Johansson could take various actions, supported by case law. Purvi Patel Albers, a partner at the law firm Haynes Boone specializing in trademarks and copyright, mentions that Johansson and other celebrities can invoke right to publicity laws to protect their identifying features from unauthorized use.

COMPARISONS TO PREVIOUS CASES

Past lawsuits involving celebrity likeness in commercials, such as Bette Midler’s case against Ford and Tom Waits’ case against Frito-Lay, set precedents for AI voice clones. These victories indicate that celebrities can protect their distinctive features from being misappropriated for commercial use.

LEGAL PROTECTIONS AND CHALLENGES

To succeed in such cases, celebrities must prove that their voice or other identifying traits are unregistered trademarks and that consumers could associate them with the product being marketed. However, the lack of federal right to publicity laws poses challenges, as regulations vary by state, with differing interpretations of likeness laws.

OPENAI’S RESPONSE AND JOHANSSON’S REACTION

While OpenAI claims they did not intend for the Sky voice to imitate Johansson, consumer observations of the similarities emerged during the demo. Scarlett Johansson has hired legal counsel to inquire about how the voice was created, indicating her concern over the situation.

CEO’S ACTIONS AND POTENTIAL OUTCOMES

OpenAI’s CEO, Sam Altman, inadvertently added fuel to the fire by referencing the film "Her" during the event, leading to public speculation about the voice’s resemblance to Johansson. The temporary removal of the Sky voice may placate Johansson for now, but reinstating it with similar qualities could reignite the issue.

THE IMPORTANCE OF ETHICAL DECISION-MAKING

Questions arise about OpenAI’s motives in creating a voice resembling Scarlett Johansson’s. With Johansson’s reputation for advocating for her rights, it is unlikely that she will back down from addressing any potential infringements.

In conclusion, the situation between OpenAI and Scarlett Johansson raises important considerations regarding intellectual property rights and the ethical implications of AI-generated voices. It remains to be seen how this legal issue will unfold in the future.

Sources: